I understand that "The Golden Compass" has premiered in the Anglo countries, but Kathy and I went to see it last night after a dinner on the town. Both of us were curious about all the controversy stirred up by the fact that the author, an avowed atheist, wrote the book that the movie is based upon as a sort of response to C.S. Lewis' "Narnia" fantasy series. That the connection between the film's Inquisition-like "magisteriam" and the Catholic Church is obvious needs no reiteration here, and I'm not a proper judge of Christian history or theology anyway. I'll leave the debate on that aspect to the pseudo-intellectuals out there. Kathy and I are primarily libertarian in nature, so we chose to look at the movie as a comment on liberty and the eternal fight all individuals have with bureaucratic authority.
Frankly, the film has about everything I would've put into a fantasy saga: Talking bears, cowboys, archers, mad scientists, even a Winchester '73 rifle. The flow of the story is a roller coaster of emotions, fairly fast and the action sequences make up for the holes left by the special effects in several aspects. To quote from Fareed Ben-Youssef in his review on dailyprincetonian.com :
"Director Chris Weitz has a keen eye for creating massive set pieces that evoke both the Roman and Victorian eras. Unfortunately, the technology driving the visuals cannot support the director's ambitious vision. The animal effects, so central in a film where each character has an animal counterpart, are well-animated but look second-rate. Even more distracting, small details appear absent from the final product. For instance, while much of the film is set in the Arctic north, the film never shows frozen breath coming out of anyone's mouth. These mistakes make the actors seem utterly disconnected from the world their characters supposedly inhabit."
The one actor seemingly left "out in the cold" is Daniel Craig. I was disappointed by both his out-of-character performance and what little point he had in the film. If the next movie in the series makes it to the screen, both he and the writers will have some real back-filling to do in making up for what small contribution "Lord Asriel" has made so far.
The archers in the audience will not be disappointed, however. Both witches and pirates wield their bows with gusto, along with swords, tomahawks and knives. What few firearms appear are classics and rare pieces, making it fun for we arms enthusiasts to guess what might appear next out of the museum.
All in all, and leaving aside the minor details, you can't help but sympathize with the snippy Lyra, be appalled by Mrs. Coulter, and cheer on the grand combatants against tyranny as they meet the foe on its own frozen turf. It ain't "Lord Of The Rings", but "The Golden Compass" is a cracking good adventure story. Let the factions waste ink and webspace on the supposed religious connotations, and just enjoy the show. _________________ "For I have drawn Judah taut and applied [My hand] to Ephraim as to a bow." Zech. 9:13
http://www.freenations.freeuk.com/ http://www.melaniephillips.com/
Author
Message
joe croatia Master Bowman
Posts: 833 No Commercial Interest Location: tyneside
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 4:50 pm Post subject:
i've went to see the film few days ago for same reason and i cant say nothing bad about it. i dont know whats all the fuss about it but i liked the film. just another fantasy film and we will all agree that there will be plenty more.
joe
_________________ A person who never made a mistake never tried anything new!!
Posts: 177 No Commercial Interest Location: The Green and Pleasant Land
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 5:28 pm Post subject:
Both my kids are badgering me to take them to see this, so hopefully over the next few weeks I'll manage to see it.
Don't worry about Craig Thomas/Lord Asriel - he is more of a peripheral character in the first book, after the first few scenes. He comes into things a lot more in the second and final books. Likewise, you may be surprised about Mrs Coulter (if they follow the book reasonably closely).
I am hopeful, having seen the trailers. The recent Narnia film I found almost hopelessly 'cuddly' - LOTR done by fluffy bunnies...
_________________ I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed, or numbered!
My life is my own!
Club: Bridge Woods FAC Bow: Marksman Portland Sight: 20/20, thanks Arrows: Stuck in a tree Accesories: Knife for digging arrows out of trees
Ancient Marksman TS4
segolden Moderator
Posts: 2410 No Commercial Interest Location: Willcox, Arizona, USA
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 2:38 pm Post subject:
Captain, I'll be willing to reserve judgment on Craig, as I hope he's not so stupid as to put himself into a part that won't aspire to better things in the future films, if any. Despite the reviews, I just could not suspend disbelief in his taking over the James Bond franchise, so I suppose that I'm still carrying a bit of prejudice from that. Not having read any of the books, I'm working from ignorance.
As for the kiddies, as long as they're old enough to handle movie violence, it's not an issue. I tend to get a little apprehensive whenever animals are involved in a film plot myself, and have never liked the way most films use them in violent scenes of fictional cruelty. Here, the animals are active characters which, though it can be shocking at times, makes it somewhat easier to take when things get rough. I know my boys would've loved this movie!
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum